A review of the ICA model of stakeholders in a spatial data infrastructure (SDI)

ORCID
0000-0001-9411-2094
Affiliation
Smart Places, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa | Department of Geography, Geoinformatics & Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
Cooper, Antony Kyle;
VIAF
213163629068923462458
ORCID
0000-0001-8683-8047
Affiliation
Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
Coetzee, Serena;
GND
1239595832
VIAF
23267234
Affiliation
Department of Geography, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Moellering, Harold;
VIAF
84586532
ORCID
0000-0002-9839-7610
Affiliation
Department of Geoinformatics, Faculty of Mining and Geology, Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
Rapant, Petr;
GND
1171483805
VIAF
170885071
ORCID
0000-0003-1077-597X
Affiliation
Public Governance Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
Crompvoets, Joep;
Affiliation
Agency for Data Supply and Efficiency, Denmark
Hjelmager, Jan;
ORCID
0000-0002-4323-9674
Affiliation
Universidad Tecnológica de la Habana ["José Antonio Echeverría"], La Habana, Cuba
Fernandez Delgado, Tatiana;
VIAF
163490010
ORCID
0000-0002-6873-9798
Affiliation
Department of Systems Research, Faculty of Spatial Management and Landscape Architecture, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
Iwaniak, Adam;
VIAF
317147869
ORCID
0000-0002-0738-484X
Affiliation
Institute of Spatial Management, Department of Systems Research, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland
Kaczmarek, Iwona

The Commission on SDI & Standards (and its predecessors) of the International Cartographic Association (ICA) has developed formal models of a spatial data infrastructure (SDI), using the viewpoints of the Reference Model for Open Distributed Processing (RM-ODP) and the Unified Modeling Language (UML). The Commission described an SDI from the Enterprise Viewpoint (purpose, scope and policies for an SDI), Information Viewpoint (semantics of information and information processing in an SDI) and Computational Viewpoint (functional decomposition of the SDI into a set of services that interact through interfaces). The Enterprise Viewpoint model included six types of stakeholders in an SDI: Policy Maker, Producer, Provider, Broker, Value-added Reseller and End User. Subsequently, the Commission identified 39 sub-types of these stakeholders, though a better description of them might be as specializations, special cases, attributes, activities or roles.

We have identified and reviewed all the literature that has referenced the Commission’s papers on the SDI models. Most use the Commission’s papers for the definitions of an SDI and of the parts, processes and stakeholders in an SDI. In this paper, we discuss all those that have applied the ICA SDI stakeholder model, proposed improvements to the model and/or highlighted parts of the model that are not well understood. We also discuss some issues we identified when reviewing the models. Subsequently, we plan on proposing some revisions and expansions on this ICA model of the stakeholders in a spatial data infrastructure.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Rights

Use and reproduction: